I always think in terms of light years instead of parsecs and kiloparsecs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f0c1/6f0c1009d91f4a94bc591e70ddbb1a6822678c9a" alt="Smile :)"
Reiko wrote:I always think in terms of light years instead of parsecs and kiloparsecs.
rthorvald wrote:Reiko wrote:I always think in terms of light years instead of parsecs and kiloparsecs.
So do i. I rarely move so far away from the solar system that the numbers becomes meaningless... So i much prefer lightyears.
- rthorvald
Cham wrote:Fridger,
the LY is much easier to understand and to visualise. For the students, this is a must. Celestia should show BOTH informations.
Cham wrote:Fridger,
in ALL introductory classes to astronomy, we, teachers, are using LY. Not parsecs. So, since Celestia is mainly used in schools, LY should be shown in Celestia. Whatever your opinion on this, this is a fact of life. Period.
Chuft-Captain wrote:Notwithstanding the parsec versus LY argument, I think it would be a useful feature to allow user control over ANY displayed units, at any time, within reason. (This could be a toggle thru the different distance scales from metres -> km -> AU -> LY -> parsecs -> kPc -> MPc ) Have I missed any???
BTW. Velocity as well as distance should be also expressed in the specified units. eg. m/s -> km/h or km/s, etc...
This would allow both the purists and the plebsto be happy, making the argument superfluous.
t00fri wrote:
How about printing out radii of celestial objects in miles?After all this unit is still used a lot in schools and daily life. Right?
Bye Fridger
t00fri wrote:How about printing out radii of celestial objects in miles?After all this unit is still used a lot in American/British schools and daily life. Right?
Bye Fridger
t00fri wrote:the difference is only a factor of 3.26, anyhow. Yet 'parsec' is the unit that is uniformly used by professional astronomers/astrophysicists/cosmologists.