Nice moons comparison in GE

General discussion about Celestia that doesn't fit into other forums.
Avatar
Topic author
Cham M
Posts: 4324
Joined: 14.01.2004
Age: 60
With us: 20 years 10 months
Location: Montreal

Nice moons comparison in GE

Post #1by Cham » 11.08.2008, 17:44

There's a nice comparison in Google Earth there :
http://www.barnabu.co.uk/page/7/
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"

Avatar
Topic author
Cham M
Posts: 4324
Joined: 14.01.2004
Age: 60
With us: 20 years 10 months
Location: Montreal

Re: Nice moons comparison in GE

Post #2by Cham » 11.08.2008, 18:04

I'm now a bit worrying about Celestia vs Google Earth. GE is growing so fast, and its features set is now so impressive. Its community (and add-ons) is now extremelly large compared with Celestia's. Any thoughts on this ?
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"

ElChristou
Developer
Posts: 3776
Joined: 04.02.2005
With us: 19 years 9 months

Re: Nice moons comparison in GE

Post #3by ElChristou » 11.08.2008, 18:09

Money, money... :?
Image

Avatar
selden
Developer
Posts: 10192
Joined: 04.09.2002
With us: 22 years 2 months
Location: NY, USA

Re: Nice moons comparison in GE

Post #4by selden » 11.08.2008, 18:16

Why should Celestia try to compete with GoogleEarth? Celestia is intended to be an astronomical visualization tool, not a GIS tool.

It would be nice if Celestia could make use of some of the databases used by GoogleEarth, though, so people don't have to re-invent them.
Selden

chris
Site Admin
Posts: 4211
Joined: 28.01.2002
With us: 22 years 9 months
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA

Re: Nice moons comparison in GE

Post #5by chris » 11.08.2008, 19:35

selden wrote:Why should Celestia try to compete with GoogleEarth? Celestia is intended to be an astronomical visualization tool, not a GIS tool.
Exactly.

It would be nice if Celestia could make use of some of the databases used by GoogleEarth, though, so people don't have to re-invent them.

I've looked at Google Earth's KML file format a little bit. It would be quite a lot of work to support everything in KML files, but not overwhelmingly difficult to support some key features. Partial support for KML files could generate a lot of frustration when some certain features didn't work; choosing a concisely describable subset of features might mitigate this problem (e.g. "Placemarks are the only KML entities recognized.)

An important feature of Google Earth is that it's very simple to install add-ons: you just click on a kmz file and it appears in the list of installed items. It should be this easy to install an add-on in Celestia, too.

--Chris

BobHegwood
Posts: 1803
Joined: 12.10.2007
With us: 17 years 1 month

Re: Nice moons comparison in GE

Post #6by BobHegwood » 11.08.2008, 20:05

Although GE looks impressive, as far as I know, it still does not allow one to view almost any object in the Universe...
How can there be any comparison? :roll:
Brain-Dead Geezer Bob is now using...
Windows Vista Home Premium, 64-bit on a
Gateway Pentium Dual-Core CPU E5200, 2.5GHz
7 GB RAM, 500 GB hard disk, Nvidia GeForce 7100
Nvidia nForce 630i, 1680x1050 screen, Latest SVN

Avatar
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 7 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Re: Nice moons comparison in GE

Post #7by t00fri » 11.08.2008, 20:22

selden wrote:Why should Celestia try to compete with GoogleEarth? Celestia is intended to be an astronomical visualization tool, not a GIS tool.
....

Selden,

strictly speaking, you are correct of course. Yet in a more general context, there are a number of features that are up for comparison: like the ease and handling of 3d navigation, the smoothness of generating 3d terrain on the fly, patching textures quickly together etc. Altogether I could enumerate a number of features in GE that would make a VERY good show in Celestia and make me a little envious...

Fridger
Image

ElChristou
Developer
Posts: 3776
Joined: 04.02.2005
With us: 19 years 9 months

Re: Nice moons comparison in GE

Post #8by ElChristou » 11.08.2008, 20:39

t00fri wrote:...there are a number of features that are up for comparison: like the ease and handling of 3d navigation...

Any interest in discussing this point in a specific thread for eventually work on some modif of Celestia?
Image

danielj
Posts: 1477
Joined: 15.08.2003
With us: 21 years 3 months

Re: Nice moons comparison in GE

Post #9by danielj » 12.08.2008, 00:04

I don?t like GE very much.It?s very unstable in my configuration.I put a certain number of models and then the program lock down.If I desinstall,reinstall,but not uninstall the models,the problem remains.It?s very annoying...


Return to “Celestia Users”