i recently bought a evga 9600 gso 384mb for my computer and i play on a 47 inch lcd. so when i tried to play crysis @ 1960x1080 it was running at like 3 fps so. so what is a (evga or nvidia) that will show considerable performance over what i had.
my specs
500 watt power supply
dual core processor @ 2.11 ghz
9600 gso
2gb ddr2 ram
thanks
best upgrade from 9600 gso
-
Topic authorterryhillis
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 10.07.2008
- With us: 16 years 4 months
best upgrade from 9600 gso
Last edited by terryhillis on 10.07.2008, 13:56, edited 1 time in total.
Re: best upgrade from 9600 gso
You need a card which includes a good fan and you need to not block the system's ventilation openings.
Graphics cards run much hotter when they're drawing 3D than they do when they're drawing a 2D desktop.
Graphics cards run much hotter when they're drawing 3D than they do when they're drawing a 2D desktop.
Selden
-
Topic authorterryhillis
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 10.07.2008
- With us: 16 years 4 months
Re: best upgrade from 9600 gso
oh sorry i kinda worded that weird when i said fried i didnt mean literally just like really bad performance. but thanks, i didnt know that
Re: best upgrade from 9600 gso
Higher numbered models give better performance.
9800>9700>9600. Or you might consider their next generation card, recently announced, the GTX 280, if you can afford it.
Tom's Hardware has a reasonable summary of graphics cards at http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gam ... ,1965.html
ATI often is better at DirectX, but Nvidia traditionally has had fewer bugs in their OpenGL support, which is what is needed for Celestia.
9800>9700>9600. Or you might consider their next generation card, recently announced, the GTX 280, if you can afford it.
Tom's Hardware has a reasonable summary of graphics cards at http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gam ... ,1965.html
ATI often is better at DirectX, but Nvidia traditionally has had fewer bugs in their OpenGL support, which is what is needed for Celestia.
Selden