My much improved galaxy database for download &TESTING

Discussion forum for Celestia developers; topics may only be started by members of the developers group, but anyone can post replies.
Avatar
Cham M
Posts: 4324
Joined: 14.01.2004
Age: 60
With us: 20 years 10 months
Location: Montreal

Post #21by Cham » 01.04.2007, 20:29

I don't think there's an easy solution to the selection problem. Markers can't be clicked. The only "natural" way is to turn around, select a clickable object and then repeat the process until we get close enough of the object we want to see. Actually, I think this is even part of the fun, with Celestia. It feels like real exploration ! :D
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"

Vincent
Developer
Posts: 1356
Joined: 07.01.2005
With us: 19 years 10 months
Location: Nancy, France

Post #22by Vincent » 01.04.2007, 20:46

Well, another easy workaround would be to increase the limiting magnitude to its maximum value with ']'. This really makes galaxies more easily selectable. It also increases the number of labelled galaxies in the neighborood of the observer. Then, one can use 'E' to activate/unactivate the galaxy labels...

I'll investigate the problem more deeply, as well as your new galaxy catalog, when I'm back from my 3 days off in Paris... :)
@+
Vincent

Celestia Qt4 SVN / Celestia 1.6.1 + Lua Edu Tools v1.2
GeForce 8600 GT 1024MB / AMD Athlon 64 Dual Core / 4Go DDR2 / XP SP3

Avatar
Topic author
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 8 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post #23by t00fri » 01.04.2007, 21:13

Vincent wrote:Well, another easy workaround would be to increase the limiting magnitude to its maximum value with ']'. This really makes galaxies more easily selectable. It also increases the number of labelled galaxies in the neighborood of the observer. Then, one can use 'E' to activate/unactivate the galaxy labels...

I'll investigate the problem more deeply, as well as your new galaxy catalog, when I'm back from my 3 days off in Paris... :)


But that exactly doesn't work at such large distances as one would start from with z-dist.celx. The lever arm is simply too small. That's the first one tries of course.


I prefer the following 3rd workaround. After starting with z-dist.celx, hitting ESC and then returning to sol (H G), one still sees all the galaxies marked, but now one can enjoy the usual label display thresholds. Moreover, activating the constellation boundaries is also a big help for orientation. My above image displaying the various galaxy clusters is such an example.


Bye Fridger
Image

Avatar
Cham M
Posts: 4324
Joined: 14.01.2004
Age: 60
With us: 20 years 10 months
Location: Montreal

Post #24by Cham » 02.04.2007, 03:31

Fridger,

I've found a bug in your new database :

Image

Both galaxies DDO 226 and IC 1574 appears to be the same object, with a slightly different coordinate.

Also, Vincent's script shown below doesn't work correctly anymore, I don't know why :

Code: Select all

function mark_dso()
    ndso = celestia:getdsocount()
    i = 0
    while i < ndso do
        dso = celestia:getdso(i)
        hubbleType = dso:getinfo().hubbleType
      if string.find(hubbleType, "E") then
         dso:mark( "red", "circle", 1, 0.5 )
      elseif string.find(hubbleType, "Irr") then
         dso:mark( "yellow", "circle", 1, 0.5 )
      elseif string.find(hubbleType, "SB") then
         dso:mark( "green", "circle", 1, 0.5 )
      elseif string.find(hubbleType, "S") then
         dso:mark( "blue", "circle", 1, 0.5 )
      end
        i = i + 1
    end
end

mark_dso()
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"

Avatar
Topic author
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 8 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post #25by t00fri » 02.04.2007, 06:52

Cham wrote:Fridger,

I've found a bug in your new database :

Image
...


Thanks, that is the typical kind of things we have to look out for, since they are beyond my influence:

++++++++++++++++++
The general rule with galaxy nomenclature in ALL catalogs, including the new 'catalog of neighboring galaxies', is to place the NGC and IC names as the principal names if a NGC/IC name assignment exists.
++++++++++++++++++

In the ZCAT catalog this was correctly done (IC 1574, DDO 226).

However in the new ,neighboring galaxies' catalog DDO 226 was INCORRECTLY placed as the first and only name.

That error created the double object ;-)

This should be an exception, however and the fix is trivial.

It is comforting to see how close the two objects lie despite their distance being taken from two different sources, and in one case calculated as the comoving (cosmological) distance from the given redshift.

The difference in distance is only a /fraction/ of their size...

Bye Fridger
Image

Avatar
Topic author
t00fri
Developer
Posts: 8772
Joined: 29.03.2002
Age: 22
With us: 22 years 8 months
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post #26by t00fri » 02.04.2007, 07:10

How do people feel about the nomenclature for the many dwarf galaxies in the Local Group. Various different ones are popular:

Right now I used only the constellation name in full:

Sculptor, Fornax, Draco, Carina,...

should I add the word Dwarf or not? Another option is
to just use 'Dw' or 'dw' acronyms after the names.

In addition there are often 2 variants, e.g. an 'Irr' variant and a dSph (spheroidal morphology). So naming becomes quite tricky and varies greatly among catalogs.

e.g

Sag dSph

is the most popular...
In general I tended to use a name that may be found also e.g. in the NED and Simbad interactive databases.
But it does not work in all cases since also NED and Simbad name recognition is sometimes mutually exclusive...

Bye Fridger
Image

Vincent
Developer
Posts: 1356
Joined: 07.01.2005
With us: 19 years 10 months
Location: Nancy, France

Post #27by Vincent » 02.04.2007, 07:22

Cham wrote:Also, Vincent's script shown below doesn't work correctly anymore, I don't know why :

Code: Select all

function mark_dso()
    ndso = celestia:getdsocount()
    i = 0
    while i < ndso do
        dso = celestia:getdso(i)
        hubbleType = dso:getinfo().hubbleType
      if string.find(hubbleType, "E") then
         dso:mark( "red", "circle", 1, 0.5 )
      elseif string.find(hubbleType, "Irr") then
         dso:mark( "yellow", "circle", 1, 0.5 )
      elseif string.find(hubbleType, "SB") then
         dso:mark( "green", "circle", 1, 0.5 )
      elseif string.find(hubbleType, "S") then
         dso:mark( "blue", "circle", 1, 0.5 )
      end
        i = i + 1
    end
end

mark_dso()

Cham,

This script has been updated several times, following the changes in CVS.
I've just checked in a last change into CVS that makes celx distinguish between galaxies, nebulae or openclusters.

You can update your source from CVS, then use the following script to mark all galaxies according to their Hubble type :

Code: Select all

function mark_galaxy_types()
   for dso in celestia:dso() do
      if dso:getinfo().type == "galaxy" then
         hubbleType = dso:getinfo().hubbleType
         if string.find(hubbleType, "E") then
            dso:mark( "red", "disk", 1, 0.7 )
         elseif string.find(hubbleType, "Irr") then
            dso:mark( "yellow", "disk", 1, 0.7 )
         elseif string.find(hubbleType, "SB") then
            dso:mark( "green", "disk", 1, 0.7 )
         elseif string.find(hubbleType, "S") then
            dso:mark( "blue", "disk", 1, 0.7 )
         end
      end
    end
end

celestia:unmarkall()
celestia:setrenderflags { markers = true }
mark_galaxy_types()


I'll post some updated versions of the different scripts we wrote about DSOs (and even more... :wink: ) on the appropriate thread : http://celestiaproject.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=85531
@+
Vincent

Celestia Qt4 SVN / Celestia 1.6.1 + Lua Edu Tools v1.2
GeForce 8600 GT 1024MB / AMD Athlon 64 Dual Core / 4Go DDR2 / XP SP3

Avatar
Cham M
Posts: 4324
Joined: 14.01.2004
Age: 60
With us: 20 years 10 months
Location: Montreal

Post #28by Cham » 02.04.2007, 15:06

Thanks Vincent,

it's working now.
"Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin", thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!"


Return to “Ideas & News”